Research: Top Liposuction Technique for 2015
Traditional Liposuction methods have proven to be timeless in terms of effectively eradicating the unwanted fat and bulges from one’s body. Nevertheless, that success seems natural today, since it has gone a long way through since the mid 1970s (when it was launched) in terms of safety and effectiveness. But even though having liposuction today is far more secure and reliable than ever before, there is still room for progress. With that in mind, and opting always for the finest solutions, we have again brought together all the data relating to the 5 Top Liposuction Techniques for 2015, on our way to determining which one is the most dependable choice for someone who wishes to dispose off the loathsome extra inches.
Most Popular Techniques
Currently, there are many options available in the market. To find the most popular ones the safest method is the one that utilizes real polls but we were not able to do this. The next most effective option was to get stats from the world wide web. We conducted on-line research using details from search engines like Google, Bing, Yahoo etc so as to scrutinize the most popular methods – that is, those which are mostly sought after by potential customers during browsing through the net. The tools we used were Google Trends, Google Keyword Planner, Bing Keyword Research. We took into consideration search stats during the period May 2014 – April 2015 and we proudly present the list of the Liposuction methods mostly in demand:
Our Evaluation System
The next step in our quest for the Top Liposuction Technique for 2015 is to blend the results of every method’s review and its specific traits with original customer testimonials (i.e. comments stemming from people who have actually came in for those techniques). The outcome of this process is again, to our humble opinion, the most creditable of all. In much the same spirit, we have also ranked every evaluating factor (side effects, consumers’ reviews, efficiency, cost and skin tightening) in a way that safety, impartiality and effectiveness are promoted, whereas the latter two variables are classified as slightly less important. So, our evaluation system is as follows:
Side Effects: 10 points are granted if the method is completely devoid of side effects whilst 0 points is the “fine” for the occurrence of severe adverse reactions
Consumer Reviews: The method which has received an outstandingly enthusiastic appraisal is endowed with 10 points whereas only 2 points are handed out to the one which has suffered the most negative reception
Efficiency: 10 points are bestowed on the method which has proven to deliver supreme results against fat; on the other hand, just 2 points are brought to any method that failed to deliver any noticeable improvement
Cost: A very competitively priced technique gets 5 points whereas the minimum of 1 point is awarded to a truly exorbitant one
Skin Tightening: The method that managed to achieve skin tightening receives 3 points, the solution which comes to nothing in terms of that gets, unsurprisingly, 0 points
Vaser Lipo: 7
Smart Lipo: 6
Slim Lipo: 7
Vaser Lipo: 9
Smart Lipo: 8
Slim Lipo: 8
Vaser Lipo: 9
Smart Lipo: 8
Slim Lipo: 8
Vaser Lipo: 2
Smart Lipo: 3
Slim Lipo: 4
Vaser Lipo: 1
Smart Lipo: 2
Slim Lipo: 3
1st: Slim Lipo 30 points
2nd: Vaser Lipo 28 points
* * : Liposculpture 28 points
4th: Smart Lipo 27 points
5th: Cellulaze 20 points
In a nutshell, all the above methods do bear their plus points – and the differences between them are discernible. After all, it’s the perpetual evolution (owing to the constant technological process) that can deliver reliable and effective fat elimination almost irrespective of the particular choice that a customer opts for. Still, in a highly competitive environment such as the current cosmetic market, every simple point counts, and that’s what can determine the winner.
All that serves as an introduction to saying that Slim Lipo seems to be having the edge over the pursuing methods (Vaser Lipo, the newly entering Liposculpture and, to a slightly smaller extent, Smart Lipo); still, all those techniques appear to live up to their patients’ expectations. A disheartening fact has to do with Cellulaze falling back significantly in comparison both with the other solutions and with the performance it achieved last year.
However, the ranking that has come from calculating every crucial variable should not be considered as mandatory for any potential user. In fact, some factors may be deemed as of greater importance for some people (for instance, skin tightening may be rated by some individuals as equally weighty as overall efficiency, or some people may think of efficiency as more important even in collation with the likelihood of encountering adverse reactions during or after the operation).
All things considered, you can feel sure that the overall evaluation is completely impartial. So, use it sensibly as a guide in order to find the path to the safest and most effective method that would suit your needs properly. Finally, don’t forget that consulting a qualified medical professional is vital before you settle on!
* We need to make clear that liposculpture is not a specific patented device (like the 4 other competitors). It’s rather a technique that has specific features which makes it different from every other device and this is why we accepted Liposculpture as a competitor in our study.. also notice that Liposculpture can be carried by means of laser, ultrasonic high frequency pulse or tumescent anesthetics. More info on Liposculpture can be found here.